Showing posts with label photography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label photography. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 April 2011

The Invention of Photography: the First Fifty Years

Read a neat little paperback The Invention of Photography: the First Fifty Years, by Quentin Bajac (published 2002, Thames & Hudson, translated from French.

Bajac worked as a curator at Musee D’Orsay from 1995 and organised many exhibitions of early photography. This paperback is illustrated with some iconic images I have seen before but also has many I haven’t. From the work of early pioneers such as Daguerre to the arrival of the Kodak camera which made photography accessible to the masses, it is a fascinating short history.

I hadn’t realised that the first Kodak camera arrived as early as 1888, or that so many distant countries, such as China, were photographed, or that even then street photography featured among the pioneering photographers. I am trying to get hold of a copy of John Thomson’s Street Life in London (1877-8). This book gives me a taster and I want to see more.



To order you own copy of this book, go to
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Invention-Photography-First-Fifty-Horizons/dp/0500301115


chosen iconic image

Photo of : Pierrot photographe dit aussi
Le mime Deburau avec un appareil photographique.
[Pierrot the photographer also called.
The mime Deburau with a camera]
By Félix Nadar


In the autumn of 1854 or the winter of 1854-1855, Nadar, who had brought his young brother Adrien into his business, asked the mime Charles Deburau (1829-1873) from the Théâtre des Funambules to pose for a series of "têtes d'expression". Deburau was the son of the famous Baptiste Deburau, the model for Jean-Louis Barrault's rôle in Marcel Carné's film Les enfants du Paradis (1945).
Then, with the help of an influential friend, Félix Nadar exhibited this series of photographs at the Universal Exhibition of 1855 and won a gold medal for them. However, it was awarded not to Félix but to Adrien, who had taken his brother's professional name, calling himself Nadar jeune. This prompted a lawsuit which Félix finally won in 1857.

The portrait of Pierrot as a photographer is the first in the Deburau album. It was the perfect introduction to the series intended to promote Nadar's studio. The star is shown alongside a camera which he seems to be operating. His left hand is telling the model to look at the lens and not at him. With his right hand, he is taking out a plate.
The long tripod on this camera gives it an anthropomorphic look, and it becomes a strange stage companion to the clown. And this couple, man and machine, seems to be a reflection of Nadar, bustling around his own camera. One can imagine the plate in Pierrot's hand containing an undeveloped portrait of Nadar at work, just as the plate taken out by Nadar contains the image we see here. Thus each becomes the photographer and the model of the other. This confusion of identities is in the best tradition of the Commedia dell'arte.

Sunday, 17 April 2011

Jeff Wall

Jeff Wall is arguably the most important photographer working today. Phaidon recently published a book showcasing 1,000 masterpieces from more than 30,000 years of art history. It contained only one photographer. Rather than Atget, Brassaï or Cartier-Bresson, the experts editing the book chose Wall. Wall was born in 1946 in Vancouver, where he lives and works today.
Jeff Wall has had retrospective exhibitions at London’s Tate Modern and New York's Museum of Modern Art. He recently had a show at White Cube Mason's Yard, consists of three large-scale colour transparencies mounted on aluminium light-boxes, of the kind that Wall has been making since the late 1970s, and six black-and-white photographs. All the pieces have been created in the past year or so, and are priced between £100,000 and £400,000.
One image I really like is ‘Dressing Poultry’, in which three women process chicken carcasses in a cluttered barn on a small farm near Vancouver. The women laugh as they go about their gory business, loading headless chickens into an old plucking machine, before transferring their corpses to a table. To the left, hunks of pink and pimply flesh hang from a rope. He paid farm hands let to him document their work over several days.
Although famous for grand tableaux, which he shoots in sections over several months before stitching together the final image using computer montage, for this he did not digitally manipulate the image but still took several hundred shots. But in this case, he paid the farm-hands to let him document their work.
I like his heightened sense of the surreal – the happy women with dead chickens and it seems to almost present a vision of hell, with the detrius of modern life, like a Bruegel painting. It is his sense of form that means critics have placed his work not only in context of the history of photography but of art.
Much of his work records everyday objects and people but not in a grand way. A bar of soap in a dirty sink, a takeaway carton, it seems to represent everyday life of people and objects that are disposable, that have been discarded and thrown out as rubbish. They are not happy pictures but are often a depressing representation of the bottom of the heap.


Dressing Poultry (2007) by Jeff Wall

Eve Arnold

To Chris Beetles new gallery in Swallow Street for the Eve Arnold Exhibition. John Bulmer, John Hilleston (who ran Magnum UK) were there as was Eve Arnold herself.
Arnold was born in 1912 in Philadelphia, to immigrant Russian-Jewish parents. She started taking photographs in 1946, using a $40 Rolleicord camera. She went onto to study with Alexey Brodovitch, photographer and art director of Harper’s Bazaar, at the New School for Social Research in New York.
In 1951, she was the first woman to be associated with Magnum, becoming a full member of this photographers’ co-operative in 1957. She moved to UK in 1962 and when the Sunday Times launched its weekly magazine, became one of its main photographers. She has published many books of her work and received an OBE in 2003.
The exhibition was mainly black and white prints (only two in colour) and included many of Marilyn Monroe on film sets on her own or with other film stars, mixed with some of migrants on long island or a brothel in Cuba.
What is striking, especially with the photographs of film stars, is how they seem so candid and the subjects so unaware of Arnold. With the exception of a few that are posed, they record private moments, with the actors not seeming to notice her presence.
The fact that the film star shots were on sale at £10-18,000 did make me wonder whether, if the actors and actresses were unknown, they would be worth as much. I think a better photograph was that of the mentally ill girl in Haiti. It was ‘only’ £800.


Marilyn Monroe, going over her lines for a scene in the misfits, nevada,1960





Marilyn Monroe, Photo session, hollywood , 1955

http://overhereplease.wordpress.com/2011/02/18/a-photograph-that-made-me-think-the-work-of-eve-arnold/

wildlife photography exhibition

The Wildlife Photographer of the Year exhibition, Natural History Museum.
An amazing show of photographs from around the world. What was interesting is that a, you could not really tell which were in the under 15s section and which were adult, and b,which were amateur and which were professional.
It seems there are two sorts of wildlife photographers: those in the right place at the right time and quick enough to react when they see something hapopening, and those with amazing patience who just wait and wait for the right moment when a creature appears or jumps or looks at the camera. Obviously, in the latter the photographer has already assessed light direction but that doesn’t negate the rapid ability they need to react by pushing the shutter. The exhibiton had shots of wildlife most people will never see, in places they will never go, making many images memorable.

Winner
Bence Máté (Hungary)
A marvel of ants
When Bence first tried to photograph leaf-cutter ants in action, he thought it was going to be easy. It wasn't - he spent hours watching and following them in the Costa Rican rainforest. 'They proved to be wonderful subjects,' says Bence interview in the exhbition catalogue. He discovered that the ants were most active at night. He would follow a column as it fanned out into the forest. Each line terminated at a tree, shrub or bush. 'The variation in the size of the pieces they cut was fascinating - sometimes small ants seemed to carry huge bits, bigger ones just small pieces.' Of his winning shot, he says, 'I love the contrast between the simplicity of the shot itself and the complexity of the behaviour.' Lying on the ground to take the shot, he also discovered the behaviour of chiggers (skin-digesting mite larvae), which covered him in bites.
Nikon D700 + 105mm f2.8 lens; 1/200 sec at f10; ISO 640; SB-800 flash.




Winners: Young Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Fergus Gill (United Kingdom)
The frozen moment
On Boxing Day 2009, it was so cold in Scotland (-17°C /1°F) that the birds were desperate for food. A rowan tree at the bottom of Fergus's garden in Perthshire became a magnet for thrushes - five of the six British species - song thrushes, mistle thrushes, blackbirds, redwings and a flock of about 15 fieldfares, all frantically picking the berries. Fergus wanted to capture the freezing feel of the day while showing the character of fieldfares in action, some of which were hovering to pluck berries. His biggest challenge (other than the cold itself) was to isolate a fieldfare against a clear background, and the only way to get the angle was to stand on his frozen pond. Risking a high ISO setting as well as the ice, he caught both the moment and the delicacy of colour he was after.
Nikon D300 + 500mm f4 lens; 1/500 sec at f4; ISO 800; Manfrotto 680B monopod + 293 tripod head.


Terry O'Neills Show @ Chris Beetles

To Terry O’Neill’s show at the Chris Beetles Gallery, called 50 Years At The Top. A bubbly, enthusiastic man, he said that he was very lucky – lucky to have been working in the 60s and 70s, ‘when it was all happening’, lucky to be able to use 35mm, when no one else was in Hollywood, lucky that it was before the days of PRs having total control over celebrities. Today, he says, there is no-one around today he particularly wants to photograph and no great magazines like Life or Paris Match to publish them. He said that with photography, composition is all, followed by light.
‘But composition is key. For instance in a portrait of Terry Stamp with his then girlfriend, Jean Shrimpton, I thought their faces represented the 60s, so I wanted to take a portrait to sum this up. I wanted a really strong portrait. That’s what I mean about composition, you have to have the bravery to say what you want to say and put it on film. You can’t teach that.’
‘Some of my best shots I caught with just one frame, perhaps two. You just shoot and it wasn’t until you got them developed you see what you have got, whether you have caught the moment.’

Mainly using black and white film, O’Neill’s photographs are brilliantly composed, sometimes breaking the 2/3rds rules (as with his shot of Twiggy), sometimes posed (Raquel Welsh on the cross) or capturing a quick moment in time (Bardot with cigar), which he took on the last frame he had in his camera. O’Neill evidently acts very quickly and instinctively to catch the moment and his instinct tells him when the composition and light is right. They are all very powerful photographs, showing the settings and personality of the subjects. The end results are always more than the sum of their parts.



photo from : DRAMA! Legendary photographer,
Terry O'Neill, makes off with our Irving Penn!. -


Terry O'Neill
Jean Shrimpton & Terrence Stamp, London , 1963
20x24 inch paper
silver gelatin print

Monday, 21 March 2011

photographers- inspiration

August Sanders : who is he and what types of photorgaphy, did he do?

August Sander (17 November 1876 – 20 April 1964) was a German portrait and documentary photographer. He is described as one of the important German photographers of the early 20th century. He was born in Herdorf,the son of a carpenter in the mining industry.
When looking at his photographs , you see there is a story behind each photo, telling the story of the person in the photo.I have been inspired by Sander's when taking portraiture, to tell a story using a photo of someone by the way they look/ dress and if they are holding anything.

Below is an example of Sander's work.

Saturday, 12 February 2011

Welcome

Welcome to my Blog,
Firstly, hi to everyone out there in the world and universe. If you are reading this then you are very previleged. I will be looking into different aspects in photgraphy from galleries or museums i have or will visit, to looking at other photographers and seeing and writing about their style(s)of photographs.

I am a London based photographer at the present, but one day I will travel and photograph other cities, towns , landscapes, and more.

To see examples of my photography work,
please take a look at the link below
http://www.facebook.com/JoshuaFrancisHayesPhotography